COVID-19: Australian charities are facing an existential challenge
An urgent rountable meeting with Social Service Minister Anne Ruston had charities express they are facing and “existential” challenge during this coronavirus pandemic.
Putting an unprecedented strain on their services, organisations said they are at risk of being unable to deliver services to millions of vulnerable Australians. National food charity and social enterprise, Ozharvest, warns they could close its doors within a month if support from the government fail to come.
Financial assistance needed
Ozharvest is one of the organisations hit by the crisis after being forced to cancel vital fundraising events due to the banning of mass gatherings. The organisation delivers food to more than 1,300 charities around Australia, indirectly feeding millions of Australians.
Founder Ronni Kahn said the cancellations were the latest in a “convergence” of economic factors that had cost the organisation about $6 million. “This is going to affect us fundamentally and existentially,” she said. “If we don’t get financial assistance we will not be able to deliver the services to people who need them the most.”
Request for a 12 month moratorium
Meanwhile, the Community Council for Australia has called on all Australian governments to look beyond short-term business stimulus and ensure the biggest industry employer in Australia, the charities sector, can maintain their staff through this period of economic uncertainty.
CCA Chair Rev Tim Costello pointed out: ‘Charities employ more than 1.3 million Australians. That is more than the retail sector, more than agriculture, mining, or any other industry. Charities need certainty if they are to maintain their staff. Governments could help with that certainty by guaranteeing not to cut funding for the next 12 months. A 12-month moratorium on funding cuts would provide increased certainty for charities and boost employment.’
Some governments, including the Federal government, have indicated they may be looking to cut funding to charities as part of their attempts to reduce government expenditure.
CCA CEO David Crosbie said: ‘Charities are often overlooked when it comes to stimulus packages and economic incentives, despite the fact that they turn over around $150 billion each year, contribute more than 5% to GDP, and employ 1.3 million Australians, particularly in areas where business employment options can be limited. Already many charities are entering the starvation cycle – we need to ensure they are able to employ the staff they need now and into the future.’
Push to a “starvation cycle”
Charities have been facing ongoing reductions in government income through; efficiency dividends, increased competition for funding, unit cost government funding that does not cover full-service costs, and cutbacks to program funding. This has pushed many charities into a starvation cycle.
The ‘starvation cycle’ is where a charity tries to keep their programs and services running by not investing in their organisational capacity and reducing ongoing commitments especially in employment of staff which is the major expenditure of most charities. In practice this means charities become reluctant to employ or even maintain staff as permanent employees.
Crosbie said: ‘Charities often face unrealistic pressure to turn programs on and off like a tap. If we want our charities to be there in times of high community need, we must ensure they have the organisational capacity, the staff and the infrastructure required to fulfill their purpose and serve their communities. Short term funding undermines their capacity and reduces employment.’
Crosbie has recently argued the government should be actively considering a stimulus package for charities, ‘Following the bushfires and the emerging corona virus pandemic, CCA believes governments could provide more stimulus to the economy, increase employment and strengthen communities by investing more in the capacity of charities to better serve their communities. Stimulus should not just be about small business and tax incentives.’